On 06/07/2012 06:09 AM, Russell King wrote: > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > index 56000b3..1f7ba35 100644 > --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt > @@ -612,3 +612,14 @@ When: June 2013 > Why: Unsupported/unmaintained/unused since 2.6 > > ---------------------------- > + > +What: OMAP private DMA implementation > +When: 2013 > +Why: We have a DMA engine implementation; all users should be updated > + to use this rather than persisting with the old APIs. The old APIs > + block merging the old DMA engine implementation into the DMA > + engine driver. > +Who: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, > + Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > + > +---------------------------- Whose tree do feature-removal-schedule patches go in through? (They're not really documentation, they're design coordination/logistics.) Rob -- GNU/Linux isn't: Linux=GPLv2, GNU=GPLv3+, they can't share code. Either it's "mere aggregation", or a license violation. Pick one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
