Re: [PATCH V2] ARM: OMAP3+: PM: VP: ensure VP is idle before disable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Menon, Nishanth <nm@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Eduardo Valentin
> <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:36:35AM -0500, ext Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>>  Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I guess it is time to properly document this increasing busy loop delay..
>>> > As it is getting closer to ms scale..
>>> Does the following sound good?
>>> /* Maximum time for Voltage Processor to enter or exit idle */
>>
>> Sounds way better :-). If you have an estimation of how long it takes
>> in the average case, it might help. But I am OK already with the above,
>> in case you don't have the estimation.
> /*
>  * Maximum time for Voltage Processor to enter or exit idle
>  * worst case is around 100uSec depending on when we intercepted VP
>  * we use 5 times worst case value to be sure that the system flags
>  * invalid condition
>  */
> better?

Yes! Thanks.

>
> Regards,
> Nishanth Menon



-- 

Eduardo Valentin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux