* Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> [120512 01:26]: > On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 01:26:20, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > * Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@xxxxxx> [120511 05:51]: > > > Hi Tony, > > > > > > Here are some remaining DT patches I was not able to push at 3.4 due to some missing dependency. > > > It applies now fine on top of lo/dt branch. > > > > It seems that there are still patches being discussed for those SoCs > > and we're pretty much done for this merge window. So unless things > > drag on to -rc8, I'd say we just need to postpone merging new things > > and merge them early around -rc2. > > > > Oops... > It seems like I missed this merge window as well... We can still queue these into linux-omap for testing as soon as the patches are ready. In general, for anything more intrusive we want to have the patches sitting in linux-omap master branch and then in linux-next for at least a week. Then merging them into mainline tree is usually safe to do. The reason for this is that mainline kernel is our stable tree, not our development tree. We just need to queue most of things between -rc2 and -rc4 into the arm-soc tree, and have any issues fixed up before the merge window. Trying to cram development branches in around -rc6 just causes us a huge maintenance nightmare trying to fix up things in the mainline tree between -rc1 and -rc4. Cheers, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
