* Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> [120510 14:53]: > "Hiremath, Vaibhav" <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> writes: > > > > Let me finish up with am33xx baseport upstream activity which is currently > > going on at full swing, then next thing I will pick up is this code cleanup. > > > > I still feel, this is still a valid cleanup patch, and can be merged, as it > > is required/used when we do major cleanup. > > Well, Tony can make that decision. > > Personally, I think this patch continues to add confusion on top of an > existing mess, and to me provides the proverbial straw that broke the > camel's back. > > That being said, the INTC core is an obviously important and sensitive > piece of code so needs to be handled with care. > > In case Tony decides to merge this patch and allow a future** cleanup, > I'll provide some comments. Heh I agree with Kevin here :) Tony > ** since they rarely happen, we tend to not have too much faith in > promises of mythical "future" cleanups. This is not because we don't > trust you personally, but simply based on based experience. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
