On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 14:19:28, Paul Walmsley wrote: > Hello Vaibhav, > > looking at Table 1-1 "Device Features" of SPRUH73D, it seems that some > AM33xx family chips come with some features disabled, such as the > PRU-ICSS, the SGX, Ethernet, or USB. How will this affect the clock tree? > For example, is it correct for us to include the PRU-ICSS clock control on > a clock tree that is booted on an AM3352 or an AM3354? > > I thought of this, but if you look at the existing way of handling such Si version based clock registration is supported by "cpu_clkflg", like CK_3XXX, CK_AM35XX, etc... During my baseport patch submission, Tony had removed CK_AM33XX flag while merging them. I believe, we are trying to get rid of these flags, and that's where Tony had removed them form my baseport patch. I was not sure on how to handle this, so I decided to continue with full chip support (AM3358 and AM3359). Thanks, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
