On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Kevin
> Yes agree completely. Will describe that in the changelog.
> --
Does the following changelog look ok?
>From 37fdc2d40c9b2b19b8c5a9a4b8f7dd547d420f55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 16:32:37 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] UART: OMAP: call pm_runtime_put/autosuspend in the error cases
In the error cases the runtime_put call is missed. This patch intends to fix the
same. In case dma request fails, we fall back to the nondma mode so after
enabling the threshold call put_autosuspend.
Cc: Govindraj.R <govindraj.raja@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx>
---
drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
index fe099bb..10e80bb 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
@@ -319,6 +319,8 @@ static void serial_omap_start_tx(struct uart_port *port)
if (ret < 0) {
serial_omap_enable_ier_thri(up);
+ pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&up->pdev->dev);
+ pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&up->pdev->dev);
return;
}
}
@@ -1029,8 +1031,10 @@ static int serial_omap_poll_get_char(struct
uart_port *port)
pm_runtime_get_sync(&up->pdev->dev);
status = serial_in(up, UART_LSR);
- if (!(status & UART_LSR_DR))
+ if (!(status & UART_LSR_DR)) {
+ pm_runtime_put(&up->pdev->dev);
return NO_POLL_CHAR;
+ }
status = serial_in(up, UART_RX);
pm_runtime_put(&up->pdev->dev);
--
1.7.5.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
