Re: query about _setup() in omap_hwmod.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Friday 13 April 2012 01:39 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hello Archit,

On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Archit Taneja wrote:


If we compare how the slave clocks are enabled and disabled in _setup() and
_disable_clocks() respectively:

static int _setup(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *data)
{
	...
	...
	if (os->flags&  OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE) {
                                 /* XXX omap_iclk_deny_idle(c); */
                         } else {
                                 /* XXX omap_iclk_allow_idle(c); */
                                 clk_enable(c);
                         }
	}
	...
	...
}

static int _disable_clocks(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
{
	...
	...
	if (c&&  (os->flags&  OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE))
		clk_disable(c);
	...
	...
}

Both these functions are taking different decisions based on whether os->flags
has OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE or not.

Would this lead to some sort of clk_enable() and clk_disable() mismatch?

Looks like you didn't include the _enable_clocks() code in your E-mail:

			if (c&&  (os->flags&  OCPIF_SWSUP_IDLE))
				clk_enable(c);

_disable_clocks() is intended to balance _enable_clocks(), not _setup().

If I boot a 3.4-rc1 kernel on beagle with omap2plus_defconfig, I get:

cat /sys/kernel/debug/clock/summary | grep dss

name                parent              freq     use_count
dss_ick                        l4_ick                 83000000   4
dss2_alwon_fck                 sys_ck                 13000000   0
dss_96m_fck                    omap_96m_fck           96000000   0
dss_tv_fck                     omap_54m_fck           54000000   0
dss1_alwon_fck                 dpll4_m4x2_ck          144000000  0

dss_ick is the slave clock of all the dss hwmods on omap3. This doesn't seem
to be right, does it?

It's not 100% right, but it was intentional.  The idea being that if the
interface clocks are autoidling, there's no need to enable or disable
them.  We just enable them once during _setup(), and the hardware takes
care of it from then on.

Thanks for the clarification, Rajendra also explained the same to me yesterday :)

There were still some issues related to this, particularly on OMAP4, I have posted a patch set to fix this just a while back.

Thanks,
Archit


Anyway, the hwmod interface clock handling needs to be cleaned up... maybe
it will get done for 3.5...


- Paul


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux