On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 14:34:09, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:05 PM, Hiremath, Vaibhav <hvaibhav@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 00:05:38, Hilman, Kevin wrote: > >> "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> > I don't personally like to add features which hardly anybody use and > >> > fundamentally broken with full kernel. > >> > >> Let's keep sane defaults, but not make it unreasonable to tweak eaither. > >> > >> I suggest what has already been mentioned. > >> > >> Register both timers, but have the sync timer have a higher rating. On > >> AMxxx where there is no sync timer, GPtimer will be used. > >> > > > > This is another good option, I can change the rating of both the timers. > > With below description and given understanding/discussion/usability of both > > the timers, we can reverse the rating, > > > Btw, if we are going with this path, then there won't any need of commandline > option since clock-source can be switched from user space as well. > Yes, both the options will be open now and its upto user how he want to choose it (either bootargs or sysfs). Thanks, Vaibhav -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html