Hi Oliver, Thanks for the comments, On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 21:24:23, Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > On 03.04.2012 14:39, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > Subject line of this patch should be > > "ARM: CAN: d_can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller" > > > No, the d_can IP core is generally not limited to ARM. > > "can: Add support for Bosch D_CAN controller" > > would be perfectly fine. Agree, I will change the subject line in my next version of patch > > The correct way is: > > 1. post your new CAN driver to linux-can ML > 2. When the major reviews & style fixes are done and the driver is fit for > mainline you can post it on ti-omap ML too > > But an initial cross-posting of this CAN driver to netdev ML and linux-kernel > ML does not help anyone - it only increases traffic & confusion > It's true, I will take care from next time onwards Thanks AnilKumar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
