Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP4: CPUidle: Add coupled idle support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 03 April 2012 10:34 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hi Santosh,
> 
> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> The series adds the coupled cpuidle support for OMAP4 based on the v2
>> series posted [1]. This makes OMAP4 to support SMP cpuidle and also
>> removes the hard dependency of off-lining CPU1 to trigger deeper
>> C-states.
>>
>> I have put together a branch which is based on 3.3 kernel with
>> Len Browns next branch [2] which has time keeping and other cpuidle
>> patches which will mostly get merged by 3.4-rc1 and rebased coupled
>> idle series from [1].
> 
> Thanks for rebasing this.
> 
>> git://gitorious.org/omap-sw-develoment/linux-omap-dev.git
>> for_3.5/omap4_coupled_cpuidle-rebase
> 
> This branch by itself seems to work fine.  However, when combining with
> other stuff that has merged for v3.4, it hangs during boot.  I haven't
> yet isolated the problem, but it's easy to reproduce by combining your
> branch with v3.4-rc1:
> 
>   git checkout -b test/coupled-v3.4 v3.4-rc1
>   git merge -s recursive -X ours santosh/for_3.5/omap4_coupled_cpuidle-rebase [1]
> 
> This hangs on boot, and it seems like a coupled state deadlock because
> commenting out the coupled states in the C-state creation of
> cpuidle44xx.c makes it boot just fine.
> 
I managed to reproduce the issue. Just to ensure that any OMAP changes
have not introduced the regression I merged all Tony's pull request on
my branch and tried it out. OMAP changes are fine and coupled idle
continue to work.

Started bisecting the commits. For bisect I have to create a series
which is not dependent on Len's cpuidle updates. First round of bisect
was not successful so tried one more time. Was very close to narrowing
down on commit but then encountered set of commits where either CPUIDLE
itself is broken(deeper C-states are not getting attempted) or I get
softIRQ 08 pending error.

The last bad commit in bisect was ...
[8682df25ca9afd3aac30f2c72d00bd98de2118e8] Merge branch
'fortglx/3.4/rtc' of git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/linux into
timers/core

So far looks like, one of below series has introduced a race which is
getting highlighted with coupled cpuidle patchset.

9b612fa Merge branch 'fortglx/3.4/clocksource' of
git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/linux into timers/core
8682df2 Merge branch 'fortglx/3.4/rtc' of
git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/linux into timers/core
97ac984 Merge branch 'fortglx/3.4/time' of
git://git.linaro.org/people/jstultz/linux into timers/core

Will try to continue the debug tomorrow. let me know if you find some
thing interesting in your day time.

Regards
santosh







--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux