Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer.  With lots of
> discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
> we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the
> not-so-distant future.

Hmm, according to the script, you are the maintainer ;-)

$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> (commit_signer:8/10=80%)
Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:7/10=70%)
Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@xxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:4/10=40%)
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:4/10=40%)
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:4/10=40%)

While I realize that the get_maintainers.pl is not the final word,
you could be the acting cpuidle maintainer for this merge window
and send the pull request.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux