On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:38 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
<tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:23 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
> <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{}
>>>> as we already have them as part of bank->context now. Also, remove un-used
>>>> variable from gpio_irq_handler.
>>>>
>>>> The fixes include correction of _set_gpio_irqenable() implementation,
>>>> missing wakeup_en register update in set_gpio_wakeup(), type mismatch
>>>> of gpio trigger parameter in set_gpio_trigger(), incorrect dataout
>>>> register update in set_gpio_dataout_() and few corrections in context
>>>> save logic.
>>>>
>>>> It is baselined on top of Kevin's following series:
>>>> gpio/omap: cleanup and runtime PM conversion for v3.4
>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git for_3.4/gpio/runtime-pm-cleanup
>>>>
>>>> Series is available here for reference:
>>>> git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev for_3.4/gpio_further_cleanup_fixes
>>>
>>> This branch doesn't exist.
>> Oops... I am sorry.
>> I was in the process of updating the branch with latest comments after
>> base-lining on Grant's:
>> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git
>> Branch: gpio/next
>> Because this has all the gpio changes including Benoit's latest gpio
>> devicetree changes.
>> Should I go ahead?
> Anyways, for the time being I am updating on top of your changes as before.
> You should be able to see the branch shortly.
Please note that the branch has your following patch:
gpio/omap: fix wakeups on level-triggered GPIOs
--
Tarun
>>> Kevin
>>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
