Re: OMAP totally fucked?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 06 March 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 03:58:34PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> > We added that to avoid cluttering the drivers with a bunch of #ifdef  
> > CONFIG_OF as proposed by Grant and Rob... and most drivers adaptation  
> > were done having that assumption.
> > So if we removed that today, it will be like removing the IRQDOMAIN  
> > define during the last merge window, it will break when the drivers DT  
> > adaptation will be pulled.
> 
> But aren't the OF interfaces stubbed out in linux/of.h when DT support
> is disabled?
> 
> Or are you saying that we're heading for a situation where existing
> drivers stop working when OF isn't enabled?

Most of the interfaces are stubbed out, but not all. I guess it would
be nice to add stubs for the remaining ones, too. More consistent
as well.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux