* Bedia, Vaibhav <vaibhav.bedia@xxxxxx> [120213 07:36]:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 19:54:05, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > >>>>> "Afzal" == Afzal Mohammed <afzal@xxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > Afzal> From: Vaibhav Bedia <vaibhav.bedia@xxxxxx>
> > Afzal> Update SRAM start & size for am33xx SoC's.
> >
>
> This is a really awkward quoting style :|
>
> >
> > I don't particular know the omap sram stuff, but doesn't the 33xx have
> > 2x 64K blocks of SRAM?
> >
>
> Yes, but since the lower 64KB will not be available on non-GP device and
> only A8 can access it, for now we make use of the higher 64KB which is referred
> to as the OCMC RAM in the TRM. This will also enable SRAM usage by other drivers
> like PRU and McASP.
>
> >
> > Afzal> +static inline int am33xx_sram_init(void)
> > Afzal> +{
> > Afzal> + return 0;
> >
> >
> > I know you mentioned it in the commit message, but it might be good with
> > a comment here as well that this dummy function is needed to not get the 34xx
> > init function called for 33xx, so it doesn't get removed when somebody
> > decides to cleanup.
>
> You are right in saying that the dummy function is needed to avoid 34xx SRAM init.
> We'll have some PM related code coming in soon and hopefully the SRAM code won't change
> Without us noticing ;)
OK, applying into fixes-non-critical-part2. Our sram.c should get turned
into a device driver, there's been already similar sram driver posted
to LAKML. So that should allow us to remove the cpu_is_xxxx checks.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
