* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [120303 11:56]: > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [120303 11:29]: > > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [120303 10:57]: > > > > > > Even with the full config, making oldconfig I get: > > > > > > OMAP2420 support (SOC_OMAP2420) [Y/n] (NEW) > > > OMAP2430 support (SOC_OMAP2430) [Y/n] (NEW) > > > OMAP3430 support (SOC_OMAP3430) [Y/n] (NEW) > > > TI81XX support (SOC_OMAPTI81XX) [Y/n] (NEW) > > > AM33XX support (SOC_OMAPAM33XX) [Y/n] (NEW) > > > OMAP44XX support (SOC_OMAP44XX) [Y/n] (NEW) > > > > > > May I remind you of this mail from Linus: > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/6/354 > > > > > > So really this is a rather horrid mess. > > > > Hmm yes. Sounds like we need to remove the defaults and instead > > add them to omap2plus_defconfig. > > > > I'll do a patch to fix that. > > How about the following patch after we revert commit 72b026a4? > > That still leaves the randconfig not necessarily selecting > any of ARCH_OMAP2/3/4 issue, but that can be dealt separately > later on. Grr, need to look at it more.. Now it leaves out ARCH_OMAP2/3/4 when doing a make oldconfig with some existing .config file. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
