RE: [PATCH/RFT 1/1] OMAP2+: cpufreq: scale voltage along with frequency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Kevin,

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:58:57, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> > Using your example above, what if the closest value was 1.259V?
> > Wouldn't you then need +/- range?
> 
> In that case, it will set to next step after 1.259V.
> 
> If +/- is used, it may happen that SoC will work for a particular frequency
> at a voltage lower than it has been characterized (if you ask me to define
> characterized, I don't know, but what I know is that SoC can work at a
> lower frequency for the voltage of an OPP, but not vice versa). Still as
> voltage will be only very less than that specified by OPP, it may not be
> a problem to use +/-

Upon discussing with Sekhar, realized that I was wrong in the above
statements, +/- OPP tolerance range should be used.

Regards
Afzal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux