+ Tony, Suman
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c: In function 'omap2_mbox_probe':
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: 'omap2_mboxes' undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c:354: error: for each function it appears in.)
The below should trivially solve this, but I wonder if there was any
other merit in explicitly using CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420 there (any
different between 2420 and 2430 in that respect ?).
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
index 609ea2d..e61d275 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mailbox.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ struct omap_mbox mbox_dsp_info = {
struct omap_mbox *omap3_mboxes[] = { &mbox_dsp_info, NULL };
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_OMAP2420)
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2)
/* IVA */
static struct omap_mbox2_priv omap2_mbox_iva_priv = {
.tx_fifo = {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
