On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 02:19:41PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> >From 4d1ea22985adfe458275b9ae3e00edc6e41a267f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 15:59:51 +0530
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP4: Move the barrier memboclk_steal() as
>> part of reserve callback
>>
>> Commit 716a3dc{ARM: Add arm_memblock_steal() to allocate memory away
>> from the kernel} introduced arm_memblock_steal() which lead to
>> OMAP4_ERRATA_I688 to be broken and needed to be fixed.
>
> That is misleading. Please don't attribute blame for this breakage to
> that patch, which has nothing to do with introducing the breakage. The
> errata was broken right from the start.
That's right and I didn't mean that way.
This was the same reason, first patch I just mentioned what was wrong
in the code
rather than mention of any commit.
Tony,
Let me know if you want to add any commit history to the change since
the issue was actually existing without 'arm_memblock_stea()' commit.
I think, first change log was good enough from the fix point of view.
Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
