On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 06:19:41PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 04:31:25PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >> With 32K gp timer, tick can be driven and system can run well, so > >> allow MPU local timer to be disabled if someone requires it, otherwise > >> MPU local timer is always chosen as the default clock_event_device. > > > > The point being? > > IMO, 32K gp timer may be more energy-saving than MPU local timer > because gp timer has much less clock frequency and only half interrupts > generated in tick mode compared with mpu local timer. > > > > > What if you want to use NO_HZ? > > 32K gp timer supports oneshot mode, so it should support NO_HZ. In my test > .config, NO_HZ is enabled and system can run well. Have you actually checked the tick rate of your timer in /proc/interrupts? Have you checked /proc/timer_list to see what mode the system is in? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html