On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:23:34PM +0200, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:01:24AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> writes: > >> >> > >> >>> This one is indeed strange. I have not seen this on the 34xx devices > >> >>> I'm using (3430/n900, 3530/Overo, 3630/Zoom3). > >> >> > >> >> OK, I've reproduced this on v3.3-rc2. > >> >> > >> >> The reason I wasn't seeing this is because I'm using the fixes Paul has > >> >> already posted that fix this problem: > >> >> > >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132754676814391&w=2 > >> >> > >> >> Kevin > >> > > >> > But it looks like these are now queued for 3.4 in tty tree? > >> > >> I believe they were targettted for 3.3-rc. > >> > >> Paul, Greg, can you confirm? > > > > I have no idea what you are refering to here, please be much more > > specific. You can look at the linux-next tree to answer your question > > yourself as well... > > It's about these patches in gregkh/tty.git tty-next: > 6bbcbf2 tty: serial: omap-serial: wakeup latency constraint is in > microseconds, not milliseconds > edbe5db tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring > data in PIO mode > 5816269 tty: serial: OMAP: use a 1-byte RX FIFO threshold in PIO mode > > It would look to me like they are queued for 3.4 but Kevin says there > were intended for 3.3-rc. Kevin might have wished they would go into 3.3, but given that the first round of these patches had to be reverted, I thought it safer to wait for 3.4. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
