On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [120204 10:24]: >> Does someone want to try building and running Linux on (eg) an OMAP34xx >> platform before I post my next email message on this subject, and >> maybe send me a bunch of patches required to fix stuff, to be applied >> to my tree _and_ _then_ forwarded to Linus next Friday. >> >> So, think of this as your last chance, and you'll get the picture about >> how pissed off I am with the - yet again - current poor state of OMAP >> in mainline, which seems to happen every merge window. >> >> Consider this: when Linus started using a PowerPC platform, the PowerPC >> people quickly realized that pushing patches upstream which broke stuff >> was a really bad idea, because they got publically flamed for such >> actions especially when stuff was not obviously tested. >> >> This is no different... and this is _not_ my original email which I have >> queued up with the real hot flames in over this. This is the toned down >> version. The flames won't get sent if OMAP gets fixed quickly - and if >> testing improves to stop this constant cycle of regressions at every >> merge window. > > Do you have the patches applied already queued up in arm-soc fixes > branch? I've been sitting on those longer than I meant to, my bad. I'll send a pull request to Linus in a little bit. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
