On 01/25/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 01/20/2012 09:40 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Colin,
this patchset could be interesting to resolve in a generic way the cpu
dependencies.
What is the status of this patchset ?
I can't do much with it right now, because I don't have any devices
that can do SMP idle with a v3.2 kernel. I've started working on an
updated version that avoids the spinlock, but it might be a while
before I can test and post it. I'm mostly looking for feedback on the
approach taken in this patch, and whether it will be useful for other
SoCs besides Tegra and OMAP4.
Hi Colin,
I will be happy to test your patchset. Do you have a pointer to a more
recent kernel ?
Hi Colin,
sorry for bothering you. I am working on a cpuidle driver for an ARM SMP
board, I will be really happy to test your patchset and look how it fits
with the cpuidle driver.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
