On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:02:09PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, gregkh@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > >
> > > tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA
> > >
> > > to my tty git tree which can be found at
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git
> > > in the tty-linus branch.
> >
> > If it's not too late, I was wondering if you could drop this patch and the
> > subsequent one ("tty: serial: OMAP: transmit FIFO threshold interrupts
> > don't wake the"), in favor of the second version of this series that was
> > just posted at
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132754676814391&w=2
> >
> > If it is too late, we'll deal with it in 3.4.
>
> What is wrong with the patches that I applied?
A new workaround is used that reduces the number of interrupts to normal.
The commit messages are improved since we have a better idea of what was
wrong. There is also a new patch (patch 3) for a power management
regression in the driver.
> How about a fix-up patch on top of what I have applied instead of whole
> new ones?
That's fine, if that's your preference. It will be several patches,
though. And about 75% of the previous series would be reverted, since a
different workaround would be used.
Let me know if that is indeed what you'd like.
regards
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
