Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] mtd : Make the mtd_suspend return 0 if the suspend is not implemented

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> wrote:
...
>  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h |    6 +++---
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> index 1a81fde..c717bb6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/mtd.h
> @@ -427,9 +427,9 @@ static inline int mtd_is_locked(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
>
>  static inline int mtd_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  {
> -       if (!mtd->suspend)
> -               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -       return mtd->suspend(mtd);
> +       if (mtd->suspend)
> +               return mtd->suspend(mtd);
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  static inline void mtd_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)

I believe this fix is already accounted for in Artem Bityutskiy's
l2-mtd-2.6 repository as:

commit 091a7fe219ee8d3e76be9e02221433af10c6f574
mtd: fix MTD suspend
(http://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/l2-mtd-2.6.git/commit/091a7fe219ee8d3e76be9e02221433af10c6f574)

However, the bug made it into the 3.3 merge window, so shouldn't this
bugfix be sent upstream immediately?

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux