On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:57:09AM -0700, Paul Walmsley (paul@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg156572.html Well, if runtime PM does its job for clock manipulation properly, then things should be fine. I suppose that ->probe() will fire up first and you say it boots and detects w1 properly, so patch looks good. Feel free to add my ack -- Evgeniy Polyakov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html