Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> writes: > On Thursday 12 January 2012 03:46 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@xxxxxx> writes: >> >>> The functions omap_i2c_unidle/idle are called from omap_i2c_runtime_resume >>> and omap_i2c_runtime_suspend which is compiled for CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME. >>> Make the omap_i2c_unidle/idle also depend on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME flag. >> I probably should've done this when I initially cleaned up the >> callbacks, but since you're doing it... >> >> rather than move the functions within the file, just remove the >> functions and move the code into the runtime callbacks. > That may break the modularity of the code since the > > omap_i2c_unidle is responsible for restore. I would have preferred to keep it separate. > Do you think I could rename omap_i2c_unidle to > omap_i2c_restore instead ? that doesn't help: It does restore and (re)enable interrupts. > However don't feel strongly about it either dif you still feel that it should be moved into runtime > callbacks directly I am ok. Yes, just move it into the runtime callbacks as it's the only place they are used. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
