Hi stephane & Will,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:46 AM, stephane eranian
<eranian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> See the dmesg from my 3.2 kernel:
>
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0[ 0.000000]
Looks no obvious failure can be found from your 'dmesg'.
I have run upstream 3.2 kernel plus 6 omap4 pmu patches below and
found perf can work well on my panda board.
0001-arm-introduce-cross-trigger-interface-helpers.patch
0002-arm-pmu-allow-platform-specific-irq-enable-disable-h.patch
0003-arm-omap4-hwmod-introduce-emu-hwmod.patch or Benoit's debugss patch[2]
0004-arm-omap4-create-pmu-device-via-hwmod.patch[3]
0005-arm-omap4-support-pmu.patch[4]
0006-arm-omap4-pmu-support-runtime-pm.patch[5]
Could you verify the above patches on 3.2 to see if perf can work well?
If it doesn't, I may share my u-boot and mlo for your test if you'd like to do.
BTW: #1 and #2 have been in Will's -next tree.
thanks,
--
Ming Lei
[1], uname -a & cat /proc/interrupts
[root@root]#uname -a
Linux beagleboard 3.2.0+ #480 SMP PREEMPT Wed Jan 18 11:38:33 CST 2012
armv7l GNU/Linux
[root@root]#cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
29: 29014 17353 GIC twd
33: 56231 0 GIC arm-pmu
34: 0 25778 GIC arm-pmu
[2], http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=132162118104901&w=2
[3],http://marc.info/?t=132227621500002&r=1&w=2
[4],http://marc.info/?t=132227621700002&r=1&w=2
[5],http://marc.info/?t=132227621700003&r=1&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
