On Tuesday 17 January 2012 07:11 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:27:25PM +0000, Aneesh V wrote:
Hi Catalin,
On Tuesday 17 January 2012 05:41 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 08:54:44AM +0000, Joe Woodward wrote:
So, is the upshot of this that the kernel isn't going to be in a
position to enable the L2/outer cache on OMAP3 (due to the need for
hacky/unmaintainable code)?
Hence the bootloader/uBoot had better leave it enabled...
It could but the Linux decompressor needs to be aware and either flush
the L2 (more difficult as it doesn't have all the device information) or
Cortex-A8 is aware of L2$ and can flush it, isn't it?
As I said to Santosh, I only had the outer cache in mind (e.g. PL310).
There is no extra configuration needed in the kernel decompressor in
this case.
set the page table attributes to outer non-cacheable (TEX[2:0] = 0b100).
If the above is right, this is not needed right?
Correct, since L2 is inner cache.
The latter may still not work if there are stale L2 cache lines left by
U-Boot (and that's always possible unless U-Boot also uses outer
non-cacheable memory attributes).
U-Boot flushes the caches before disabling it. On top of it, it does an
invalidate after the disabling the caches to cover some corner case.
So, it's guaranteed that there won't be any stale entries in L2 after
U-Boot.
So, we could as well leave L2$ enabled (and invalidated) and caches
disabled globally after U-Boot.
Yes.
But I thought enabling L2$ again in kernel is the cleaner solution.
Why? It gets enabled via SCTLR.M together with L1.
Well, technically I don't see any issue. But after all, it's a
bootloader dependency that could be avoided. We could not blame U-Boot
or any other bootloader for disabling L2$ given [1]
[1] http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/booting.php#5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
