On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:25:32AM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote: > However, the result of cpufreq_scale() differs from that of > (re)calibrate_delay() by ca. 6%, i.e., 70.40 vs. 74.54. Please advise if > this approximation is acceptable. You don't say which figure is what. Note that calibrate_delay() is itself inaccurate - the loops_per_jiffy is the number of loops which can be executed between two timer ticks _minus_ the time to process the timer interrupt itself. So, it's actually always a little less than the theoretical number of loops within that time period. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
