RE: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] OMAP: voltage: add a hook for normal regulator calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 00:37:38, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
[...]
> >
> > We want to use the existing OMAP implementation of cpufreq (and DVFS) on 
> > the devices which do not have VC/VP.
> >
> > The current OMAP cpufreq code under drivers/ invokes clk_set_rate().
> >
> > We had a look at the future DVFS implementation for OMAP[1] and merged in 
> > the relevant patches (hope this is close to what's planned).
> 
> Unfortunately, that implementation is not what's planned, and in fact
> was rejected some time ago.

That's really unfortunate :(

> 
> > After this change, cpufreq invokes omap_device_scale(). The DVFS code
> > makes use of the OPP layer and adds a request for voltage and frequency
> > change. However, the voltage change request expects the scaling to be done
> > in scaling functions defined in the voltage layer (vc->scale or vp->scale)
> >
> > On devices which do not have VC/VP, instead of just hacking the current
> > implementation to get the voltage scaling done, we thought of adding
> > a separate path.
> 
> A much better path for SoCs without VC/VP is to simply modify the
> CPUfreq driver to use the regulator API to scale voltage before calling
> clk_set_rate() (if scaling up) and after scaling the frequency (if
> scaling down.)

I assume this needs to be done using the OPP library?

> 
> In fact, that is the direction we're going for DVFS, even for VC/VP
> platforms.  There will be a regulator driver which will call the
> voltagedomain/VC/VP calls to scale the voltage when needed, so from a
> DVFS perspective, you use the clock API to change frequency, and the
> regulator API to change voltages.

Wouldn't this end up adding OMAP specific code into the various regulator
drivers? If TPS65910 gets used on a variant that has VC/VP, won't this
require making changes in the regulator drivers to being with?

> 
> This should be a much simpler approach for you, and much easier to
> understand.

Yes, making calls to the regulator and clock frameworks is much simpler
and desirable.

Regards,
Vaibhav 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux