Hi Balaji,
Thanks for the review.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:58 AM, T Krishnamoorthy, Balaji
<balajitk@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 5:44 AM, Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Sergio Aguirre <saaguirre@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
>> index bfbd660..e26b564 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/twl-core.c
>> @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static struct twl_mapping twl6030_map[] = {
>> { SUB_CHIP_ID0, TWL6030_BASEADD_ZERO },
>> { SUB_CHIP_ID1, TWL6030_BASEADD_ZERO },
>>
>> - { SUB_CHIP_ID2, TWL6030_BASEADD_ZERO },
>> + { SUB_CHIP_ID1, TWL6030_BASEADD_AUX },
>
> Instead you can use TWL6030_MODULE_ID1, with base address as
> zero for all registers in auxiliaries register map.
Ok.
I'm actually thinking about this, and in the process on reviewing the
need to access those registers.
I should probably be using the regulator framework to control VAUX3 instead...
Thanks for your inputs.
Regards,
Sergio
>
>> { SUB_CHIP_ID2, TWL6030_BASEADD_ZERO },
>> { SUB_CHIP_ID2, TWL6030_BASEADD_RSV },
>> { SUB_CHIP_ID2, TWL6030_BASEADD_RSV },
>> --
>> 1.7.7.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
