Vishwanath Sripathy <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> writes: > Hi Kevin, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Vishwanath Sripathy [mailto:vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 4:53 PM >> To: Kevin Hilman >> Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain >> support via hwmod mux >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@xxxxxx] >> > Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2011 6:28 AM >> > To: Vishwanath BS >> > Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/7]ARM: OMAP3PLUS PM: Add IO DaisyChain >> > support via hwmod mux >> > >> > Hi Vishwa, >> > >> > Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> writes: >> > >> > > The folowing patch series provides IO Daisychain feature via >> omap >> > hwmod mux >> > > framework. >> > >> > The series looks OK at first glance, but needs a refresh against >> > current >> > mainline. >> OK. >> > >> > Can you refresh this against Tony's 'fixes' branch and re-test. >> > >> > I tested this on OMAP3430/n900 and noticed that it no longer hit >> off >> > mode from idle. >> > >> > IOW, If I enable UART timeouts and then enable off mode, I don't >> > actually ever hit off during idle. However, if I do a >> > suspend/resume I >> > see it hits off mode, then subsequent attempts to hit off during >> > idle work. >> > >> > Can you investigate this? >> OK. Let me check that. > I rebased these patches against latest Tony's fixes branch and tested it > on OMAP3430 SDP. I see that Core enters off mode in idle path after > setting UART timeout w/o having to suspend the system. OK, sounds good. Do you have a branch that I can test as well? Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
