On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 17:29 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 07:20:32PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 16:52 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > My basic reaction to this is "eew, ick". Doing this with a runtime call > > > just feels badly joined up, and there's nothing here which hands off the > > > configuration between the various drivers involved in the transitions. > > > We need to make sure that the voltage doesn't suddenly lurch around when > > > doing transitions. > > > Would you feel better if we just hacked around with the twl-regulator > > driver and added a compile time switch for the voltage get/set for smps > > regulators? > > No, that's clearly going to break multi-board kernel images. If this > is something board specific platform/device tree data sounds like the > way forwards. Okay, so I will update this patch with proper locking and you should be okay with that approach? Usually in the omap case we just want to switch to using the external controller during init time and leave it be like that, there is no really use-case as such for runtime switching of controller, except maybe for some experimental / debug usage. -Tero -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
