* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [111123 14:36]: > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [111123 13:47]: > > On Wednesday 23 November 2011 14:03:58 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > The earlier patches are based on the earlier fixes (while waiting > > > for them to get merged). So that's certainly not a random commit. > > > Or at least was not at that time I can rebase those too anyways > > > now that the earlier fixes are merged. > > > > No need to do that unless you are rebasing them anyway. IMHO > > it's fine if you have all your bug fixes in one branch based > > on the previous bug fixes you sent, but it's of course also > > fine to start a fresh branch for each pull request. > > > > In general, I would recommend not rebasing when you have the > > choice, because that means your patches are not as well tested. > > Well I can keep only four of them because of the pull on a random > commit. Looks like four of them apply to v3.1, will send them > off to stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and send you two new pull requests. FYI, forgot to mention that I verified that merging in the two pull requests produces the same end result as the original pull request. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
