On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 02:22:16PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:14:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > The name will be fixed by the individual device bindings, this is > > specifying the general form of a supply property. Each device binding > > will define the set of supplies that the device can use. > Ah, ok. It shouldn't be a part of this binding then and instead be added > to the bindings for the consumers. I think it's useful to define how consumers are supposed to do this somewhere - it is actually part of the core binding how consumers are supposed to do this. There's also a bit of magic here for chained supplies with one regulator supplying another (eg, using a DCDC to drop the system supply down to a lower voltage to supply a bunch of LDOs for improved efficiency). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html