On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 23:42, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:59:14PM +0200, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> i saw that !CONFIG_REGULATOR works great. my concern is that these >> boards don't define any regulators for smsc resources, so if >> CONFIG_REGULATOR is enabled to test out unrelated daughter cards, i >> don't want the network driver suddenly failing. Linus' comments >> suggest that this is what would happen unless each board file has its >> smsc platform resources extended. maybe i misunderstood what he was saying ? > > That's the case that's handled by CONFIG_REGULATOR_DUMMY - if the lookup > fails the core will provide a virtual regulator to the consumer. If > you're running a setup like that you probably want to enable dummy > regulators anyway. ok, if people configuring need only select that Kconfig symbol to make it work, i'm fine with things. thanks for the explanation. -mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
