On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 02:09:22AM +0100, Ming Lei wrote:
> >> - for (i = 0; i < pmu_device->num_resources; ++i) {
> >> + for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; ++i) {
> >> irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
> >> if (irq < 0)
> >> continue;
> >
> > Hmm, I actually changed this code recently. Take a look:
> >
> > https://github.com/wdeacon/linux-wd/blob/perf/system-pmus/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> >
> > This should all be in for 3.2-rc1, so you can rebase then. If you still have
> > hwmod issues, please solve them outside of perf_event.c
>
> Looks your patch has solved the problem, so the patch is not needed
> any more.
Hurrah! If you can get the OMAP / hwmod bits acked by the OMAP guys then I'm
happy to take the perf and PMU changes into my tree.
> I will try to rebase the patchset on your tree first.
Well that stuff should be in for -rc1, so you're probably better off
rebasing onto that when it lands. You could always use -next in the
meantime.
Cheers,
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
