On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 02:23:50PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > On Monday 24 October 2011 01:47 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > >On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:32:19AM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >>On Friday 21 October 2011 05:28 PM, Shawn Guo wrote: > >>>On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:11:55PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >>>[...] > >>>>>+ /* find device_node and attach it */ > >>>>>+ rdev->dev.of_node = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, regulator_desc->name); > > Shawn/Mark, > > How about the driver passing the of_node to be associated with the > regulator, as part of regulator_desc, to the regulator core, > instead of this complete DT search and the restriction of having > to match DT node names with names in regulator_desc. > If you agree that we should try to get DT core from creating 'struct dev' for each regulator, the of_node is not being attached to any 'struct dev' in regulator driver either, so there is no difference between finding the of_node in regulator driver and in regulator core. -- Regards, Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
