On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:42:16PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: *Please* delete irrelevant quotes from mails. > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:05:56PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > Yes, it seems like a good idea given that most drivers seem to blindly > > pass the regulator_init_data onto regulator_register, however there > > are cases like the twl regulator driver which seems to peek into the > > constraints passed from the board to make sure it drops anything that > > the hardware does not support, > I'm not sure why twl works in that way. Is it a sign that those > configuration peeked by twl regulator driver should be encoded in twl > regulator driver itself instead of being passed from the board? Or > why the board does not pass something matching driver/hardware > capability to save that peek? It's completely unneeded but harmless, it's there because there were a large number of discussions going on with the original author and it was easier to merge the code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
