On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Govindraj <govindraj.ti@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Govindraj <govindraj.ti@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@xxxxxx> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>> Use device_may_wakeup to check whether uart has wakeup capabilities
>>>>>> and then enable uart runtime usage for the uart.
>>>>>
>>>>> Curious about what happens when device_may_wakeup() is not set during
>>>>> device init.
>>>>>
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -1305,6 +1363,16 @@ static int serial_omap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>> up->uart_dma.rx_dma_channel = OMAP_UART_DMA_CH_FREE;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev,
>>>>>> + OMAP_UART_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + pm_runtime_irq_safe(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>> + if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
>>>>>> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>
>>>>> So if device_may_wakeup() is false, runtime PM is not enabled, then...
>>>>>
>>>>>> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>
>>>>> ...this get doesn't happen, and the first register access causes a crash.
>>>>
>>>> Actually no crash, clocks will left enabled from boot up (hwmod_no_reset/idle)
>>>> that are idled and enabled back here.
>>>>
>>>> Since hwmod_idle is binded here later ([PATCH v6 15/16]),
>>>
>>> IMO, That's not a very maintainable solution.
>>>
>>> What happens when when someone fixes serial.c to only set
>>> HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE on the console UART? or if we fix things so we don't
>>> need INIT_NO_IDLE anymore? Then this will crash.
>>>
>>> Driver code should not make assumptions like this about what device init
>>> code is or isn't doing.
>>>
>>
>> Okay, How about doing as below ensuring get_sync always
>> and forbid runtime to avoid clock_gating if wakeup is not set.
>>
>
> This is better, I'm not crazy about that either.
>
> Consider a platform that doesn't have wakeups, but the UARTs are not
> used (at least initially.) That means on power up, all the UARTs are
> left enabled to consume power even when they're not used.
>
okay, the right place would be serial_omap_pm
to do add runtime forbid.
whenever the uart port is used it will call serial_omap_pm
with state param assigned value zero from serial_core layer
for open system call from user space.
Also when uart port is closed it will shutdown where we can add runtime_allow.
So for uart ports not wakeup capable keep uart clocks on until
used and once port is shutdown cut uart clocks.
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
index 8a955fc..2c43744 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
@@ -608,6 +608,10 @@ static void serial_omap_shutdown(struct uart_port *port)
up->uart_dma.rx_buf_dma_phys);
up->uart_dma.rx_buf = NULL;
}
+
+ if (!device_may_wakeup(&up->pdev->dev))
+ pm_runtime_allow(&up->pdev->dev);
+
pm_runtime_put(&up->pdev->dev);
free_irq(up->port.irq, up);
}
@@ -893,6 +897,10 @@ serial_omap_pm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int state,
serial_out(up, UART_LCR, UART_LCR_CONF_MODE_B);
serial_out(up, UART_EFR, efr);
serial_out(up, UART_LCR, 0);
+
+ if (!state && !device_may_wakeup(&up->pdev->dev))
+ pm_runtime_forbid(&up->pdev->dev);
+
pm_runtime_put(&up->pdev->dev);
}
--
Thanks,
Govindraj.R
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
