On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 11:19:43AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > > > do we have sibling structures today? I dont think so.
> > >
> > > no we don't.
> >
> > Ok, here's a first shot at it:
>
> In fact we do already have sibling lists. They are maintained as part
> of the device_private structure. What we are missing is a
> device_for_each_sibling() routine. It could be added pretty easily; it
> would be similar to device_for_each_child().
care to point out where is ?
68 struct device_private {
69 struct klist klist_children;
70 struct klist_node knode_parent;
71 struct klist_node knode_driver;
72 struct klist_node knode_bus;
73 void *driver_data;
74 struct device *device;
75 };
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
