On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 20:57 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 12:48:21PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > I think it needs to be done subsystem by subsystem, > > arch by arch, as maintainers accept. > Agreed - but doing one instance here, maybe another instance somewhere > else, and come the merge window having several of these patches > scattered around with no real coherent "this is what we're doing, and > its all done for this bit of the tree" kind of story is not the way to > do it. > It would be good to get core code done, or a sub-arch, and then say > "we're not accepting any patch which re-introduces the problem"... > It's a little late in the cycle for that now though. Well, if you want it done for arch/arm, just let me know when it would be convenient for you and I'll do them all as a single patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
