On Thursday 06 October 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> [111001 13:21]: > > On 09/30/2011 05:29 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > > > Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> writes: > > > > > >> The upcoming OMAP4 PM series from Santosh[1] that we're planning to > > >> queue for v3.2 has a dependency[2] on a patch currently queued for v3.2 > > >> in the irq/core branch of Thomas' tip tree[3]. > > >> > > >> In the past, I noticed you merged external trees like this to solve > > >> dependencies. > > >> > > >> Could you pull the irq/core branch into your tree to meet this > > >> dependency? > > > > > > On second thought, since Santosh's branch is the only one with this > > > dependency (and we also have a dependency on Russell's devel-stable) > > > I'll just build up a branch for Santosh's series that includes > > > rmk/devel-stable and tglx/irq-core. > > > > > > > Any new platforms will have a dependency on rmk/devel-stable with the > > mach header clean-up. I'll probably have a dependency on tglx's tree as > > well. > > Sounds like Arnd should pull this into some branch then. I've pulled in rmk/devel-stable as a dependency now, thanks for reminding me of that. Thomas, where should I get the irq-core branch (or whichever I should wait for) to pull in as another dependency. Is that branch one that never gets rebased? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
