* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> [111006 23:06]: > On Thursday 06 October 2011 03:36 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxxx> [111004 17:26]: > >> On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > +void __iomem * > > +__arm_ioremap_exec(unsigned long phys_addr, size_t size, int cached) > > +{ > > + unsigned int mtype; > > + > > + if (cached) > > + mtype = MT_MEMORY; > > + else > > + mtype = MT_MEMORY_NONCACHED; > > + > Why don't we allow user to pass the mtype here ? Well we want to keep the MT_MEMORY types out of asm/io.h. > We do have a need also to map a page of DDR and SRAM as > strongly ordered for errata fix and this interface can be > used for that. Yeah.. > Ofcourse, SO memory type is not executable memories, so the > API name might be miss-leading. ..so I think we should just have a separate static mapping for the omap4 errata fix SO page, and just limit the memory available for SRAM code to ioremap. How does that sounds to you? Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html