On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote: > The approach is OK with me, but I'm a bit torn about whether or not to > merge this since the need for this should go away when converting to DT. I guess it will still take some time until our boards are fully functional with DT, so I think we should regard this as an interim solution. Without this patch, a huge deal of code consolidation and generalization is gated (namely - generic iommu and dma api, and everything that depends on it, e.g. rpmsg/remoteproc). > Is anyone working on IOMMU DT description? Unless Benoit is, I'll happily pick this up. > I guess if I do merge this, we can also clean this up significantly > after all devices are converted to DT. Sure. > Unless it has other dependencies on Benoit's further DT patches, you can > base this on my for_3.2/omap_device-2 branch which includes Benoit's > alloc changes. Ok, thanks a lot ! Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
