On Monday 03 October 2011 02:45 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 03 October 2011 11:09:33 Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig >>> index bb8f4a6..f7ef9f4 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig >>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/Kconfig >>> @@ -217,6 +217,11 @@ config OMAP_PM_NOOP >>> >>> endchoice >>> >>> +config OMAP_CPU_FREQ >>> + def_bool "y" >>> + depends on CPU_FREQ >>> + select CPU_FREQ_TABLE >>> + >>> endmenu >> With CPUFREQ series from Kevin [1], I don't think we need this any-more. > > I guess if it's needed, it should at least be moved to the new cpufreq > location. > Probably you are right. CPU_FREQ_TABLE is selected today if CPU_FREQ_STAT or CPU_FREQ_GOV_ONDEMAND is selected. Without these two enabled, in won't be selected. >> More so, I didn't find OMAP_CPU_FREQ is being used anywhere on mainline. > > Yes, OMAP_CPU_FREQ is a symbol that is intentionally unused, with the > only purpose of selecting CPU_FREQ_TABLE if any omap platform together > with CPU_FREQ is enabled. > I see. This wasn't clear to me. > Let's drop this patch for now, if it is still needed as I think, I can > do a patch during the 3.2 cycle for the right location. > Ok. Regards Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
