Hi On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Saturday 24 September 2011 12:01 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Hi Santosh > > > > On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > > > >> On Thursday 08 September 2011 10:51 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >>> > >> I need your ack on below two patches so that I can re-base them and > >> send a pull request to Tony. > >> > >> OMAP4: clock: Add CPU local timer clock node. > >> OMAP: Fix sparse warnings in l3 error handler. > > > > Are you targeting these for 3.1-rc ? > > > Nope. It's for 3.2 merge window. > As such, the series doesn't have any major regression > fixes which should make it before 3.2 In that case, patches 1 and 7 should go in through me. The rest should go via Tony. So you can just drop 1 and 7 from your branch, I'll pull those off the list. Some comments though: Looks like you need to repost patch 1 due to comments from Benoît? Also, have the autogeneration scripts been updated for patch 7? ... As far as patch 5 goes, you don't need my ack on that one, since I'm not the maintainer or original author of that code. But feel free to add a Reviewed-by:. I also tested the two L3 files with sparse and they are clean now. Thanks very much for taking the initiative on this; I personally appreciate it quite a bit, and I think having clean code increases our credibility with upstream maintainers. - Paul