Hi Valdis.Kletnieks, On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:53 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:46:08 +0300, Tero Kristo said: >> Following set contains the version 9 of this work. This patch set contains >> a number of patches tagged as 'TEMP', they are only meant for testing >> purposes and to provide proof of concept. Most of the 'TEMP' patches are >> related to UART runtime handling and they will be replaced by work done >> by Govindraj Raja. > > What do we do with these TEMP patches if the UART patches don't make the same > merge window, or have other issues? I'm always leery of "will be replaced" > code, because I've seen too many times when it *didn't* get replaced. > > (I really don't care what the 'Plan B' is, as long as we have one...) UART Runtime patches are already posted for review and it's also targeted for next merge window. Our intention is to push both the features together for next merge window. Regards Vishwa > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
