On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@xxxxxx> wrote: > The (small) issue for my point of view is that the #hwspinlock is already > encoded in the IP itself. So adding a baseid directly in DT will look like > duplicating indirectly something that is already there in the HW. > That being said, since we cannot rely on the order, we will not be able to > get the proper baseid until the driver probe every hwspinlock devices :-( > So baseid might be a easier choice. Sounds good. Thanks a lot ! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
