* Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> [110715 12:27]:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13 2011, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
> >> it seems this series got lost in time, at least patches 01, 02, 03,
> >> 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 12 look like valid standalone fixes and
> >> improvements to me, they don't touch other trees and still apply
> >> cleanly, so would be good to have.
> >
> > Yeah. I didn't merge them because Tony still has unanswered comments on
> > the OMAP side of the patches, and they're submitted as a single patchset.
> >
> > I've applied {2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12} to mmc-next for 3.1 now. 1 doesn't
> > apply because the function doesn't exist anymore. 4 doesn't apply
> > because iclk doesn't exist anymore.
> >
> > If someone wants to look at rebasing the rest of these against mmc-next
> > and resubmitting, I think that'd be useful.
>
> Thanks! 1 and 4 seem to be unneeded any more (I was trying them on
> linux-next, not noticing it was not updated for a while), and others
> have comments pending, so it's all done.
So I guess that means I don't need to look at anything, right?
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
